Why & how has Elon Musk, someone with a personal relationship and secure communications link with Putin gained so much control of spatial signals intelligence and optical penetration? It seems crazy from a USA national security perspective. When you combine this with Musk & Thiel’s promotion of corporate nation states replacing representative democracy and Trump’s lizzard brain affiliation with dictators, and The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 / corporate coup d’ etat the net effect is a drive toward nihilistic fascist mafia state hegemony; not exactly Mom, apple pie, & The American way.
Thanks, Kevin, for highlighting this critical “five eyes” issue that the mainstream media seems to be totally missing. This consequential group is so integrally necessary to the security of each, we cannot let this slacken.
It would help if a Steady State member could address the matter of unlawful vs patently illegal orders given to our military or intelligence service. I was surprised by this article, which explains the complexity and burden on service members. I'm left wondering about, for example, invading another country. Or selling technologically advanced aircraft to our enemies. Would such acts (which undermine national security, or destroy a nation) be "patently illegal"?
After Trump;s “peace deal” w/ Putin over Ukraine, it’s not going to be just the Five Eyes. He’s going to make it so noone trusts the US.
Why & how has Elon Musk, someone with a personal relationship and secure communications link with Putin gained so much control of spatial signals intelligence and optical penetration? It seems crazy from a USA national security perspective. When you combine this with Musk & Thiel’s promotion of corporate nation states replacing representative democracy and Trump’s lizzard brain affiliation with dictators, and The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 / corporate coup d’ etat the net effect is a drive toward nihilistic fascist mafia state hegemony; not exactly Mom, apple pie, & The American way.
Thanks, Kevin, for highlighting this critical “five eyes” issue that the mainstream media seems to be totally missing. This consequential group is so integrally necessary to the security of each, we cannot let this slacken.
It would help if a Steady State member could address the matter of unlawful vs patently illegal orders given to our military or intelligence service. I was surprised by this article, which explains the complexity and burden on service members. I'm left wondering about, for example, invading another country. Or selling technologically advanced aircraft to our enemies. Would such acts (which undermine national security, or destroy a nation) be "patently illegal"?
https://www.ms.now/opinion/msnbc-opinion/democrats-trump-disobey-illegal-orders-video-military-expert-rcna245168
Gift article regarding a still-classified Department of Justice memorandum approving boat strikes.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/13/us/politics/boat-strikes-doj-memo-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.3U8.myXA.0IuDTc08Radt&smid=nytcore-android-share
You may want to check out: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1FR7RAlt-NSoPBNzfdaorkc-rVCg0Y7C-/edit?usp=drive_link&ouid=100200289163516807955&rtpof=true&sd=true